<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Puerto Rican Spanish | Lee-Ann Vidal Covas, PhD</title><link>https://leeannvc.com/tags/puerto-rican-spanish/</link><atom:link href="https://leeannvc.com/tags/puerto-rican-spanish/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Puerto Rican Spanish</description><generator>HugoBlox Kit (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><item><title>Subject Pronoun Expression in Puerto Rican Spanish</title><link>https://leeannvc.com/projects/subject_pronouns/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://leeannvc.com/projects/subject_pronouns/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In Spanish, finite verbs can occur &lt;strong&gt;with or without an expressed subject pronoun&lt;/strong&gt; — as in &lt;em&gt;yo hablo&lt;/em&gt; &amp;lsquo;I speak&amp;rsquo; vs. &lt;em&gt;hablo&lt;/em&gt; &amp;lsquo;(I) speak&amp;rsquo; — without altering the meaning. Drawing on sociolinguistic interviews from Puerto Rican speakers in Louisiana and Puerto Rico, I examine how grammatical and discourse constraints pattern this variation. Results reveal &lt;strong&gt;Caribbean-typical pronoun rates (~37%)&lt;/strong&gt; and show that internal morphosyntactic factors, not English contact, drive pronoun use in this sample.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;At a glance&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table&gt;
&lt;thead&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th&gt;&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/thead&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Sociolinguistic interviews with 20 speakers (≈2,300 tokens); analyzed with Goldvarb&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Predictors&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Person/number, switch-reference, tense–mood–aspect, prior-subject realization, clause type, and verb semantics&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Timeline&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Conducted at Louisiana State University; later informed dissertation research expanding the same variable to new samples and contexts&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Key findings&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Pronoun rates ≈ PR 37.8% vs. LA 37.0%.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1SG/3SG&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;switch-reference&lt;/strong&gt; favor pronoun usage; &lt;strong&gt;plurals&lt;/strong&gt; disfavor it.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Only location shows a clear social effect — &lt;strong&gt;routine English contact did not increase pronoun usage.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>